home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
Turnbull China Bikeride
/
Turnbull China Bikeride - Disc 2.iso
/
BARNET
/
ARMLINUX
/
MAIL
/
9709
/
000049_owner-linux-arm…r.rutgers.edu _Mon Sep 22 14:19:19 1997.msg
< prev
next >
Wrap
Internet Message Format
|
1997-11-30
|
2KB
Return-Path: <owner-linux-arm-outgoing@vger.rutgers.edu>
Received: from nic.funet.fi (nic.funet.fi [128.214.248.6])
by odie.barnet.ac.uk (8.8.6/8.8.6) with ESMTP id OAA03330
for <willy@odie.fluff.org>; Mon, 22 Sep 1997 14:19:18 +0100
Received: from vger.rutgers.edu ([128.6.190.2] EHLO vger.rutgers.edu ident: root [port 29714]) by nic.funet.fi with ESMTP id <12759-30106>; Mon, 22 Sep 1997 16:17:36 +0300
Received: by vger.rutgers.edu id <973203-269>; Mon, 22 Sep 1997 09:08:45 -0400
Received: from snowcrash.cymru.net ([163.164.160.3] EHLO snowcrash.cymru.net ident: IDENT-NOT-QUERIED [port 1468]) by vger.rutgers.edu with ESMTP id <973221-269>; Mon, 22 Sep 1997 09:02:41 -0400
Received: (from alan@localhost) by snowcrash.cymru.net (8.8.5-q-beta3/8.7.1) id NAA07556; Mon, 22 Sep 1997 13:57:31 +0100
From: Alan Cox <alan@cymru.net>
Message-Id: <199709221257.NAA07556@snowcrash.cymru.net>
Subject: Re: Latest kernel in development?
To: dg@cogency.co.uk (David Alan Gilbert)
Date: Mon, 22 Sep 1997 13:57:31 +0100 (BST)
Cc: linux-arm@vger.rutgers.edu
In-Reply-To: <3426759E.FB6CC7AD@cogency.co.uk> from "David Alan Gilbert" at Sep 22, 97 01:41:50 pm
Content-Type: text
X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-arm@vger.rutgers.edu
Sender: owner-linux-arm@vger.rutgers.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO
> Until there is a definition for ARM ELF and then patches to GCC, binutils for it
> we are stufed.
> ARM have been promising the definition for ages now but so far I have
> seen very little.
The definition is irrelevant. If ARM can't get themselves sorted out then
declare an ARM "FreeELF" standard and use it. It's rarely worth sitting on
your arse waiting for a large standards type organisation to do something.
Alan